Czechoslovakia
On May 12, Czech television broadcast a confirmation made by
Azerbaijani officials that the Agroplast company, based in the
northern Bohemian town of Liberec, attempted to smuggle six MiG-
21 fighter aircraft to North Korea two months ago. On March 19,
the customs authorities in Baku detained dismantled MiGs found on
board a Russian Antonov An-124. According to Azerbaijani
authorities, the plane carrying MiGs arrived in Baku from
Kazakhstan. The aircraft was then to be flown to North Korea,
which technically remains in a state of war with the Czech
Republic's NATO ally, the United States.
Reacting to the findings, the Czech Minister responsible for the
Security Information Service, Jaroslav Basta, said his agency has
been monitoring Agroplast's activities since 1994, but it did not
anticipate that the company would break the law. Agroplast holds
no license that would allow it to sell arms to other countries.
The MiG scandal is just another in a series of controversial
cases suggesting that, although it is now a NATO member, the
Czech Republic continues to ignore Czech businesses' arms
dealings with political outcasts.
When it was still a member of the Warsaw pact, Czechoslovakia
(the country split into two independent republics, the Czech
Republic and Slovakia in 1993), had a reputation of being a major
ammunition and explosives supplier to renegade regimes and
terrorist groups. Until the fall of the Iron Curtain,
Czechoslovakia was believed to be one of the world's largest
suppliers of plastic explosives. During the 1970s and 1980s, the
Communist Czechoslovak government sold large amounts of Semtex
plastic explosive to a number of nations that allegedly sponsored
terrorist groups, including Libya, Iraq and North Korea. Semtex
was allegedly used to destroy Pan American Airways Flight 103
over Lockerbie, Scotland, in December 1988, killing 270 people.
Semtex also showed up in the Afghanistan war. Although Semtex is
now believed to be under strict control, and there is a tough
export control policy requiring a case-by-case examination of any
arms sales from the Czech Republic by the ministries of foreign
affairs, defense, trade and the interior, there is a powerful
black market in the country. According to the Czech Security
Information Service, it is possible to illegally obtain a large
number of unregistered arms and ammunition, including Semtex.
Following the collapse of the Czechoslovakia communist regime in
1989, the Czech Republic made great progress in becoming a part
of Western political, military, and economic structures. At the
same time, however, the country was struggling economically to
survive the difficulties associated with the post Cold War
economic transformation. Although official figures show arms
sales from the Czech Republic declined in the 1990s, a number of
cases in recent years reveal that the country was involved in
arms dealings with its traditional customers and former communist
allies. In 1997, for instance, the Czech government, after the
intervention of Washington, halted the attempt by the Czech
military and some government elements to sell five Tamara
stealth-detection radar systems to Iraq for $375 million.
Bulgarian arms dealers allegedly assisted the Czechs in this
sale. In 1995, NATO reportedly suspected that Czech-made Tamara
radar systems were used by Bosnian Serbs in the hills near
Sarajevo to help shoot down a U.S. F-16 fighter.
In April this year, several intelligence sources, including Czech
military counterintelligence, claimed Yugoslavia had at least one
Tamara, and possibly used it for detecting and shooting down the
U.S. F-117 stealth aircraft on March 27. Diplomatic sources
quoted by "Intelligence Newsletter" on April 8 said that a couple
of weeks before NATO started its air operations in Yugoslavia,
Russia supplied the Serbian military with a sophisticated
detection system that enabled it to shoot down the F-117.
Immediately after the aircraft was shot down, the Czech Defense
Ministry launched an investigation into whether Tamaras were
supplied to Yugoslavia, and if so, by whom. Because, before
1990, the former-Czechoslovakia had sold several Tamaras to
Russia, they could have been passed to the Serbs via Moscow.
According to a former employee of Tesla Pardubice -- the Czech
company that produces Tamaras -- if the system was used in the
Kosovo conflict, it could only be operated by someone trained by
Russians, who were, in turn, trained in the Czech Republic.
Although Tesla may not now be directly involved in the alleged
transfer of Tamaras to Yugoslavia, the allegation that Prague
must have been the original source of this technology is
indicative of the open channels for commerce in high tech weapons
systems.
Whatever the nature of the past involvement of this government in
such arms deals, the weapons manufacturers in the Czech Republic
currently put the Czech Republic's NATO allies in a precarious
position by providing equipment and technical know-how to NATO
and U.S. adversaries. In particular, Prague has received several
U.S. State Department protests over its cooperation in helping
develop the nuclear industry in Iran. The Czech Republic,
together with Russia, has been supplying Iran's nuclear power
project with equipment and providing it with consulting services
in nuclear technology. Although the U.S. has repeatedly made it
clear to the Czech Foreign Ministry through diplomatic channels
that such help provided to Iran by a NATO member is not
permissible, the Czech companies continued conducting nuclear
business transactions with Teheran. The interruption of
cooperation would result in large financial losses for the
relevant Czech firms.
Although the Czech Republic recently became a NATO member, this
country, which used to be heavily involved in arms dealings with
"pariah" regimes, apparently has not ceased these activities
completely. Illegal arms transactions, allegedly with Iraq,
North Korea, and Yugoslavia, suggest that the Czech businesses,
perhaps backed by some elements in the government who are
prepared to turn a blind eye to the transactions, are prepared to
ignore the country's new geopolitical allegiances. As we have
already mentioned, Czech businesses are strongly tempted by the
extraordinary profits to be made by selling arms and weapons
systems to "pariah" regimes. Prague's relations with its NATO
allies will suffer if it continues to ignore the problem --
especially if NATO pilots and soldiers fall victim to the
weapons.
The Czech Republic faces a serious dilemma with its future
European Union membership. Following the 1993 split of
Czechoslovakia, the two newly independent states -- the Czech
Republic and Slovakia -- established a customs union agreement
that allowed a free movement of goods and services between the
two countries. Because the Czech Republic made significant
progress towards its European integration, the country has been
put on a fast track to the EU accession, together with Hungary,
Poland, Estonia, Slovenia, and Cyprus. But Slovakia's European
integration process has been delayed due to political criteria
non-compliance by the previous government of Vladimir Meciar.
Although Prague and Bratislava both insist on maintaining the
economically beneficial single customs area, the EU has
repeatedly voiced its opposition to giving Prague an exception
from the EU laws. On June 22, EU's commissioner for foreign
politics, Hans van den Brooke, said the existing customs union
agreement posed a serious obstacle to admitting Prague into the
EU. The Czech government now faces a serious dilemma. Either
Prague must break the customs union agreement with Slovakia and
suffer severe negative economic consequences or it must further
threaten its own chances for early integration into the EU by
maintaining the treaty. So far attempts to find an acceptable
compromise on the issue have failed.
The 1993 customs union agreement between the Czech Republic and
Slovakia assures the free movement of goods and services within a
single customs unified area, avoiding customs and non-tariff
measures. The agreement established a common customs tariff and
a trade policy toward third countries. It also guaranteed common
customs legislation, tariff measures, and customs certificates.
The customs union agreement is so crucial for Prague and Slovakia
because economies of the two countries are strongly
interconnected.
Although the Czech Republic and Slovakia are both top economic
performers among the post-communist countries of Eastern and
Central Europe, the two countries' standing with respect to
accession into the EU is not equal. Slovakia has been
sidetracked from the European integration process due to non-
compliance with political criteria, while the Czech Republic
fulfills most of the EU membership requirements and is one of six
countries that are expected to be admitted into the EU in the
first wave.
During accession negotiations between the EU and the Czech
Republic, the issue of the Czech-Slovak customs union agreement
has resurfaced with the potential to hinder Prague's integration
prospects. In May 1999, the EU ruled against the incorporation
of the Czech-Slovak customs union agreement into European law.
On June 22, EU's commissioner for foreign politics, Hans van den
Brooke, said that the existing customs union between the Czech
Republic and Slovakia posed a serious obstacle to admitting
Prague into the EU. Van den Brooke said the EU's common trade
zone would be threatened if Prague were given an exception from
the EU law on this matter, as that would force other EU members
to install customs controls for checking origins of goods. On
June 23, Germany's EU Minister Gunter Verheugen said talks on
expanding EU's internal market to the applicant countries were
complicated by problems with the Czech Republic, because Prague
insists on maintaining the customs union with Slovakia.
Until now, the Czech Republic has been trying to convince the
European Union to grant Prague an exception from the EU customs
law. The creator of the Czech economic transformation policy,
Vaclav Klaus, argued that the Czech-Slovak customs union would be
sustained even after his country's admission into the European
Union, because other prospective EU members from Eastern Europe
have also been given a number of exceptions. Moreover, Prague
now appears to be looking for a solution to the customs union
issue in promoting a transfer of Slovakia into a first group of
EU applicant countries. Following the last year parliamentary
elections in Slovakia, Prague consistently backed its eastern
neighbor's integration efforts. Most recently, Czech Finance
Minister Ivo Svoboda expressed support for the idea that
Bratislava be included in the first group of aspiring EU members.
Prague favors shifting the "Schengen border" from the one between
the Czech Republic and Slovakia to the Slovak-Ukrainian border.
The new Slovak government of Mikulas Dzurinda, which declared
achieving EU and NATO membership its top priority, would welcome
acceleration of its European integration as a solution to the
problem the Czech-Slovak customs union poses in regards to EU's
enlargement. The worst scenario for Bratislava would be a
breakup of the customs union with Prague, as such act would
significantly undermine the country's economy. Slovakia and the
Czech Republic, therefore, were up till now acting jointly on the
issue of the customs union in regards to the EU expansion.
Following the most recent statements by the EU indicating serious
opposition by this multinational grouping to granting Prague the
exception for the EU customs law, the Czech Republic has been put
in an extremely difficult position. Prague was given a choice to
either terminate its customs treaty with Bratislava, or to be
seriously handicapped in its European accession process.
While politically the Czech Republic and Slovakia have followed
their own paths, they have not been able to, nor has there been a
great need to, shake the deep economic integration instilled over
years of union. Their different politics separated the Czech
Republic and Slovakia in the accession process, but their
economic ties now make this politically-rooted timing decision a
difficult and potentially quite painful one to carry out.
Ironically for the EU, if it succeeds in forcing Prague to
dissolve its customs union with Slovakia, the resulting economic
damage to the Czech Republic may leave the EU with an economic
cripple for a new member. Like conjoined twins that share
certain organs but different personalities, the Czech Republic
and Slovakia are as hard to split as they are to accept as one.
Neither the EU or Prague wants the Czech Republic to be
economically damaged, while both sides want the Czech Republic in
the EU. This raises the question, does the Czech Republic want
EU membership more, or does the EU want the Czech Republic more?
It also raises the question, which will cause the EU more
economic pain, accepting a crippled Czech Republic or accepting
the Czech Republic and its conjoined twin? With the looming
return of confrontation between Europe and Russia, the Czech
Republic does not want to be caught in the middle. By the same
token, the Czech Republic is already in NATO, and so Europe has a
vested interest in seeing that it remains economically and
politically healthy and integrated with the West. Given the fact
that most Western European countries are currently headed by
socialist governments worrying about the social impact of EU's
eastward expansion, Prague should not expect the EU to be
inclined to letting itself opened to a free flow of commodities
and labor force from the Eastern Europe.
Neither side has an easy choice to make. Given its options, it
is unlikely Prague would make any extreme decision in the near
future. Rather, Prague can be expected to keep pushing for some
kind of a compromise. Europe might just play along for a while,
if only to postpone a painful decision. In the interim, Slovakia
again becomes key -- as key to sustainable EU expansion as it was
to viable NATO expansion.
Following the autumn 1998 parliamentary elections in Slovakia, in
which democratic forces ousted former Prime Minister Meciar from
power, the country's prospects for integration with western
economic and politico-military structures have improved. Most
recently, head of the European Commission's negotiating team,
Nikolaus van der Pas, said at a meeting with the Slovak Foreign
Ministry Secretary, Jan Figel, that Slovakia could theoretically
catch up with the first wave of countries currently participating
in EU accession talks. Because the process of implementing
necessary reforms and of adjusting legislation to that of the EU
requires considerable effort and time, it is questionable,
however, if Slovakia could catch up with the first group of
applicant states.
It is in the interest of all concerned that Slovakia be put on a
fast track to catch up with its Eastern European neighbors. All
that is missing is money and time.
Czech opinion polls indicate the Czech Communist Worker's Party
(KSCM), which already has 4 seats in the Czech senate, will
increase its share in upcoming elections. One-third of the 81
seats are up for grabs in the August 27 vote. The front-runner is
the dominant Czech Social Democratic Party (CSSD), now holding 23
seats. The second largest party, the right-wing Civic Democratic
Party (ODS), holds 26.
If opinion polls accurately reflect voters' intentions, the Czech
senate will be a very different place after the election.
Communist representation could double. At this point KSCM's
popularity stands at about 17 percent, with the ruling party CSSD
at 15 percent and the ODS at 23 percent.
While there is lingering resentment at the loss of Slovakia, much
of the surge in support for the KSCM and right-wing opposition
groups is pure frustration at a badly mishandled economy. The
Czech Republic, like Slovakia, is in a deep recession. Worried
about unemployment, the Czechs are increasingly interested in
trying to keep Slovak workers out of the republic.
Topping it off, the republic's decision to join the European Union,
which is struggling even to build a common currency, is widely seen
as stretching the limits of a mismanaged economy. Czech dependence
on the EU is growing, too. Czech central bankers are testing the
international bond markets, with reported plans for a US$300
million bond issue.
Though desired, the reality of the transition to the West has been
a jolting surprise to many Czechs. Acceptance to NATO earlier this
year has come with a considerable price tag. Early in the year,
western militaries began turning up the pressure for aspiring
nations to modernize their militaries. And as soon as the summit
in Washington granted the Czechs membership, they were asked to
extend overflight rights to alliance aircraft enroute to bomb
Yugoslavia. As the war dragged on, and talk of invasion mounted,
the republic faced the unpleasant prospect of having to help invade
a fellow Slavic nation.
The communists opposed entry into NATO, when the senate voted in
April, 1998, to seek membership by a margin of 64 to 2. Ever since
then, the KSCM has been taking advantage of anti-Western sentiment,
including feelings against radical economic reform. NATO's bombing
of Yugoslav bridges on the Danube River triggered Vojtech Filip,
the leader of the KSCM deputies group, to accuse U.S. President
Bill Clinton, U.S. Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, and Gen.
Wesley Clark, the NATO commander, of war crimes. Though extreme,
these accusations are consistent with the KSCM perspective.
KSCM is hostile to the growing U.S. and German influence in the
region and the West's effort to co-opt post-Soviet states for
Western strategic advances. Features of KSCM that make the party
attractive to voters are its active campaign for socialism, its
anti-corruption platform and cooperation with unions and interest
organizations.
Support for the party is genuine; but communism in the Czech
Republic is not fashionable, and is not favored by dispirited
youth. The party appears set for a promising minority role in the
parliament. Senate seats are held for six-year terms, allowing
KSCM to profit heavily.
The rise of communists in what is arguably a crown jewel for NATO
suggests a broader problem. Democracy has clearly won in what was
once called Eastern Europe. Capitalism is still an uncomfortable
companion. Poland's coalition government has begun to tackle
difficult economic reforms, particularly in heavy industry, that
were once seen as too tough. Reform is the price of joining the
EU. Poland will have to grapple with tension between its trade
unions and pro-market forces.
Hungary has created growth by selling off state-run enterprises to
foreign investors; today foreign-owned firms account for one-third
of the economy and two-thirds of exports. But Hungary, too, has a
long way to go in becoming part of the West it has ostensibly
joined.
In the Czech Republic, an increase in KSCM senate seats will give
the communists more leverage, particularly as their politics are
not entirely incompatible with other parties. With a larger senate
presence, the KSCM will be involved in more of the give-and-take of
democratic politics. This will enable it to influence the outcome
of much legislation, including legislation dealing with relations
with the West. The Czech Republic's cooperation with NATO, then,
stands a greater chance to be challenged in the long term. This
will be especially true if other parties start contending with
KSCM's popularity by borrowing from the anti-NATO, anti-EU
sentiments in their campaigns.
On the tenth anniversary of the Nov. 17 Velvet Revolution, which
led to the fall of communism, six former student leaders organized
the movement they call, "Thanks, now go!" The leaders of the appeal
- Martin Mejstrik, Simon Panek, Igor Chaun, Vlastimil Jezek, Josef
Broz and Vratislav Rehak - signed a joint statement demanding the
resignation of the government, including Prime Minister Milos Zeman
and Chamber of Deputies Chairman Vaclav Klaus. The group also
demanded early elections, but has not said for whom, as neither the
prime minister, the chairman nor the Cabinet are publicly elected.
The movement has received widespread support in the past several
weeks. The organizers say that 150,000 Czechs have signed their
demand. In a Sofres-Factum poll reported Nov. 29, a total of 73.8
percent of those questioned said that they would either vote for
the appeal in an election, or would at least not rule out voting
for it. On Dec. 3, an estimated 50,000 people massed in Prague's
Wenceslas Square, and thousands in other cities around the country
also gathered to support the appeal. Encouraged, Broz told the
daily, Lidove Noviny, that the movement is now planning to register
as the Party of Civic Decency (SOS). Many Czechs are disgusted with
the stagnant coalition government, whose internal disagreements are
preventing progress.
The Czech people are overwhelmingly in favor of a change, due to
increasingly poor economic conditions and the challenges posed by
joining NATO and the EU. Reform in the country has reached a
standstill, and leaders are fighting to overcome strict Western
requirements for integration. In a telling election in late August,
the only independent candidate running for one parliamentary seat,
Vaclav Fischer, won against the major parties by an overwhelming 71
percent. In the Nov. 29th Sofres-Factum poll results, 76.5 percent
of those polled wanted Prime Minister Zeman to resign and 61.5
wanted Chairman Klaus to step down. The Czech people want change,
but the SOS movement may not be ready to handle the responsibility.
As a political party, SOS faces internal divisions and a platform
strictly limited to bringing down the administration. Both Chaun
and Panek have said they are not considering joining the SOS or
running for political office. They merely want to bring in the
other parties to handle the political crisis in the Czech Republic,
Panek told the Czech News Agency (CTK). There are no candidates or
charismatic leaders for an SOS ballot in the event of an early
election. And, as it stands, the SOS platform does not propose an
alternative plan for the future; it merely urges early elections
and the resignation of the government. The protest has been simple
in comparison to offering a workable alternative for the future.
A decade after the fall of communism, the Czechs are still more
closely tied to the East than to the West. The Communist Party of
Bohemia and Moravia (KSCM) has been gaining popular support,
despite animosity toward the communists 10 years ago. It enjoyed
approximately 17 percent popularity in August and now has an
estimated 22 percent support, which makes it the most popular
party, according to a STEM poll from early November.
Also, the Czech Republic is failing to integrate with the West. It
is struggling to meet EU requirements and was sharply criticized in
October when an EU Commission report cited it for failing to make
necessary economic and legislative reforms. In the same month,
government reports were leaked which named Prague as the main base
for the Russian international spy network.
If the SOS achieves early elections, it may unintentionally give
the KSCM a renewed chance at influence in the Czech Republic. With
SOS fighting for a change in government yet presenting no
solutions, it may be able to call early elections but, without an
alternative, will be unable to capitalize on the results. As
support for the KSCM has increased over past months, elections
could be in its favor. If the population realizes that the SOS has
no concrete candidates or future goals, the Communists could take
advantage of the power gap and use their increasing support to gain
positions in the administration.
Not only would increased Communist authority redirect the Czech
Republic's domestic agenda, but it would also play into the tug-of-
war between Russia and the West in the Eastern European states.
NATO, already having trouble integrating the Czech Republic into
the security alliance, would be faced with an immediate crisis.